Polestar Forum banner

Why are electric cars’ wheels so ugly?

14K views 28 replies 18 participants last post by  KSTAccel  
#1 ·
Walking through central London this morning, which is now wall-to-wall electric cars, I found myself wondering why so many of them have such ugly wheels. I understand that the brakes don’t need so much cooling, but with the exception of Polestars (especially the Performance pack wheels) and a few others the majority of them are nearly solid (sometimes with bits painted black to make them look more open).
The only thing I can think of is that there is less drag when there are smaller/fewer holes in the wheel, but surely the efficiency gain from this is outweighed by all the downsides of the increased unsprung mass. And they’re so ugly!
Or is it a fashion thing and I’m just not on trend?
 
#3 ·
You can tell Polestar is a design led company because the original P*2 wheel designs prioritise aesthetics whereas most other manufacturers focus on aero efficiency. The newer MY23 wheel designs have gone more aero, and whilst I personally quite like the new non-PP 20” wheel design, I think they are a backwards step to the older 20” design aesthetically at least. I haven’t seen anything indicating an increase in range due specifically to the new aero design, but that maybe because it’s too early and no one has compared as yet. But regardless, for me personally I’d prefer to live with a slightly less aero efficient wheel design that looks significantly better. But that’s just me…
 
#4 ·
Not just wheels. Part of the reason many EVs don’t have door handles is because of aero. Ditto with non-flat grilles and the desire to have some swooping plastic monstrosity. Nice to have a company that is willing to give up a bit of the numbers game to make a better looking car.
 
#5 ·
Companies are also removing wing mirrors for cameras, apart from Aero it has the added benefit of having to work so once past warranty they can charge a small fortune for repairs.

As long as the car does 210miles (90 to 20%) in all weather and charges fairly quickly I’m happy for a prettier car than an ugly monstrosity that provides more range.
 
#6 ·
Yeah it’s a balance for me, and one of the key reasons I chose the P*2 is because I think it’s currently the most handsome car in its class. If maximum range was my primary criteria I’d have chosen a Tesla. As long as the range is good enough, then I’d always chose the car that makes me feel a bit more special driving around in it, or even just looking at it parked on my driveway. Much more important to me than a potential 10% extra range.
 
#8 ·
You cannot accuse the bst's wheels for being ugly aero design
View attachment 18075
You're right thee BST wheels are beautiful, but then again they are not an aero design. Unless I'm mistaken, they are the original wheels off the P*1 and essentially a similar design as the MY21/22 non-PP 20" wheels that I have fitted to my car:

Image


The newer MY23 non-PP 20" and 19" are designed more with aero in mind. For me, they are okay but not as good looking as the previous designs:

Image
Image
 
#13 ·
In a Facebook post Polestar admitted the new wheel designs are for aero improvement (but didn't mention the impact on Cd or range) yet also noted the new wheels are heavier - so more mass to move around. Not sure if one trumps the other but it would seem at town speeds aero effects are negligible to non-existent but carrying more mass will be a net negative. Maybe it's a highway-only impact on range? But even then Polestar themselves did not quantify.

My take? It was largely a design decision to keep the car "fresh" in its third year out without having to make any changes to tooling, batteries, motors or electronics. Probably the most cost-efficient option by far to update a new car's look.
 
#19 ·
The chunky door handles are a real class feature.. going against the current trends but along with the clean solid lines give a great aura of strength and ruggedness.. ok so we might lose a couple of decimal points on the Cd rating but it dosn’t look like a cross between a frog and a fish… no particular car in mind☺
 
#20 ·
The chunky door handles are a real class feature.. going against the current trends but along with the clean solid lines give a great aura of strength and ruggedness.. ok so we might lose a couple of decimal points on the Cd rating but it dosn’t look like a cross between a frog and a fish… no particular car in mind☺
Completely agree .... my 13yro step-daughter also agrees .... "the car looks great, I thought the Model S was boooorrrrriiiiiing" :)

I loved my Model S - in dark metallic grey, black leather with the smoke grey arachnid wheels it looked great - but the Model 3s and Model Ys are just so plane and boring to look at ... great cars when it comes to performance & distance on a charge ... but so non descript ... from a purely design perspective the P*2 is just delicious ...
Image
 
#24 · (Edited)
At least wheels are easily swapped out. I must admit I don't like it that Polestar is going in that direction, the 2023 MY wheels don't do it for me at all. To enclosed. Not as bad as others on the market but a step in the wrong direction. What's next, a generic all plastic front? Throw some more LED lines along the front of the car? Weird non functional interiors? A skateboard platform with seats where I can lick my knees?
 
#26 ·
Those 19” wheels look good . But personally I think these look better:

Image

Just personal preference of course. Fully respect the opinion of anyone who thinks the opposite.

I will be fascinated to read a future direct comparison between these two wheel designs in relation to efficiency. Will the newer design be proven to deliver a perceivable increase in efficiency? It will be interesting…
 
#29 ·
Yeah the same config I ordered popped up as a preconfigured car on the website except it has the 20" wheels instead of the 19". I really don't like the 20" wheels and think I am just going to wait, even though I really want the car.